1/n
Your suggestion to start a conversation was taken seriously in ucla.in/2EpxcNU (2018),which provides rigorous analysis of each of your
2016 arguments. In particular, it analyzes the logic of "consistency," the difficulties of defining "well-defined interventions,"
Your suggestion to start a conversation was taken seriously in ucla.in/2EpxcNU (2018),which provides rigorous analysis of each of your
2016 arguments. In particular, it analyzes the logic of "consistency," the difficulties of defining "well-defined interventions,"
2/n
the utility of defining ideal mathematical constructs and ideal manipulations,
the semantics of multi-version interventions, and the practical benefits of attributing causal qualities to non-manipulable variables, from blood-pressure and temperature to gender and obesity.
the utility of defining ideal mathematical constructs and ideal manipulations,
the semantics of multi-version interventions, and the practical benefits of attributing causal qualities to non-manipulable variables, from blood-pressure and temperature to gender and obesity.
3/n
The Appendix further examines ordinary conversations among health scientists, points out the ubiquity of non-manipulable causes and their communicational benefits. I have received no objection to any of these arguments and assumed their power and transparency convinced you
The Appendix further examines ordinary conversations among health scientists, points out the ubiquity of non-manipulable causes and their communicational benefits. I have received no objection to any of these arguments and assumed their power and transparency convinced you
4/n
and your followers in #causalinference. I still believe they deserve serious considerations. #Bookofwhy #EpiTwitter
and your followers in #causalinference. I still believe they deserve serious considerations. #Bookofwhy #EpiTwitter
