, 14 tweets, 5 min read Read on Twitter
In 1867, some two years after #AndrewJohnson assumed the Presidency on the assassination of #AbrahamLincoln, a crisis arose between the two #political branches of the government. President Andrew Johnson
That crisis culminated in Johnson's impeachment in the House of Representatives and his acquittal by the Senate.

But with what "high crime" or "misdemeanor" was Johnson charged? US Constitution, Article II
Johnson had vetoed a statute, the Tenure in Office Act, but Congress overrode his veto and the Act became the law. Under the TOA, the President was barred from removing any executive officer of the government whose appointment was subject to the advice and consent of the Senate.
Despite the Act, Johnson fired the Secretary of War, Edwin Stanton. Stanton was a holdover member of the cabinet who'd served President Lincoln. Lincoln's Secretary of War Edwin Stanton
There is some thought that Johnson had held a grudge against Stanton since Johnson was convinced to sign the death warrant for Mary Surratt, who was convicted of participating in the conspiracy to assassinate Lincoln. The hanging of the Lincoln conspirators ... Mary Surratt is on the far left of the scaffold.
Stanton may have withheld from the President the fact that several members of the military tribunal had thought Surratt's death sentence should be commuted to imprisonment.

In any event, in Johnson's view, it was time for Stanton to go, and he said so in a telegram.
Stanton refused to resign. He actually took up a position in his office, blockaded the same, and refused to depart.

Johnson fired Stanton and the stage was set for Johnson's impeachment.
Although the House impeached Johnson, the Senate trial acquitted Johnson by a single vote.
Some seventy years later, the question raised by Johnson's firing of the cabinet officer and the constitutionality of the Tenure in Office Act were resolved in favor of the power of the President in a Supreme Court case, Myers v. United States.
This morning, I'm listening to the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the nomination of Bill Barr to serve as Attorney General. Barr testifying on first day of confirmation hearing
Senator Dianne Feinstein's opening statement is what brings me back to the sordid Johnson impeachment and the history of Congress' UNCONSTITUTIONAL Tenure in Office Act.
Despite the Supreme Court's CLEAR TEACHING about the Tenure in Office Act -- that the Act violated the separation of powers between Congress and the Presidency -- Feinstein has stated that she will use the hearing to inquire into this point
... as though the Senate had actually voted to remove President Johnson and as though the Supreme Court had concluded that the Tenure in Office Act was constitutional!
Missing some Tweet in this thread?
You can try to force a refresh.

Like this thread? Get email updates or save it to PDF!

Subscribe to JMHendersonSr❌
Profile picture

Get real-time email alerts when new unrolls (>4 tweets) are available from this author!

This content may be removed anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just three indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!