(Thread) Start doing it now

Let’s suppose the unthinkable happens: Trump badgers our democratic institutions until they crumble, the 2020 election is mere ritual, nothing checks Trump’s power, and Trump makes himself an autocrat.

What then?
1/ I’ll show you how Chile got out from under an actual dictatorship and restored democracy.

I’m using Chile as an example because my husband’s family experienced the Pinochet dictatorship, so I have first hand accounts.

Sources for facts and quotations are from 👇
2/ Chile is a good example because—like the US, and unlike other countries who have experienced right wing uprisings—Chile had a long tradition of democratic institutions prior to the rise of far right wing threats to democracy.
3/ In Sept, 1973, far right wing Gen. Pinochet pulled off a military coup and installed himself as a dictator.

The coup was made possible partly because of a complete breakdown in trust between two of Chile’s major political parties. (Yeah, I know about the US involvement)
4/ Even after Pinochet installed himself as a dictator, the “distrust persisted, eclipsing their shared revulsion toward Pinochet’s dictatorship.”

Political leaders from opposing parties couldn't bear to speak to each others.

Then, in 1978, the opposing parties started talking.
5/ Eventually they rebuilt trust. By 1985, the anti-Pinochet forces came together and signed a National Accord for a Transition to a Full Democracy.

The coalition even managed to negotiate with Pinochet's hardcore right-wing supporters.
6/These talks staved off “potentially destabilizing conflicts.”👇

Democracy was restored.

Staring into the abyss of a brutal dictatorship taught the Chileans a lesson.
Fearful that another Pinochet would arise, the elected leaders developed a practice of informal cooperation.
7/ Chileans call the informal practice: “democracy of agreements.”

Thus, when enough of Pinochet’s critics came together and figured out how to negotiate with each other, Chileans were able to restore democracy.
8/ OK, so, if the worst happens and we find ourselves in an actual autocracy, the best way out is to follow Chile’s example: Find common ground with the parts of the GOP that do not support Trump’s autocratic methods, and work on negotiating with Trump’s actual supporters.
9/ If this sounds hard, the authors 👇remind us constantly that democracy is difficult, grinding work.

If you don’t think democracy is grinding work, run for local office and try to get something done.
To succeed, democracy requires compromise and concession.
10/ Putin’s active measures is partly designed to create so much division and discord in American society that a pro-democratic coalition becomes impossible.

Let’s not let Putin win.
11/ I met a cancer researcher who developed chemo drugs. She told me if she got cancer, she'd immediately go on a macrobiotic diet as the best way to organically fight cancer.

I thought: Why wait? Why not start eating more veggies, rice and beans now when the work isn't as hard?
12/ Same with getting out of an autocracy. Why wait? Why not start implementing the solutions now, when not as much is needed?

How about this as a place to start: Stop underestimating Trump, and stop blaming his victims. (Before you yell at me, let me explain)
13/ Trump a master at manipulating and controlling the national conversation.

He’s also a skilled con artist. He is conning a lot of people.

To quote Yale Prof. Jason Stanley (@jasonintrator) Trump is cynically employing fascist tactics to enrich himself.
14/ There's a portion of our population that are fearful by nature. They are, by nature, averse to complexity and therefore fearful and uncomfortable with diversity. They can't do much to change the way they are.

If you’re new to my feed, see 👇
15/ Along came Trump, who knows exactly how to manipulate them. He riles them. He created what @karen_stenner and @JonHaidt call an authoritarian dynamic👇

The antidemocratic forces have been at work long before Trump. The path was paved for him.
16/ If we can pull together more than 60% (I think about 65% is the upper limit of what is possible) into a solid anti-Trump coalition and keep trying to expand the numbers, we can prevent a full on autocracy.

In other words, use the remedy as a preventive measure.
17/ This means accepting and forgiving the members of the GOP who made Trump possible.

It means forming a coalition with people who I can guarantee will say things you don't like.
17/ We won’t always like what they say. But we need them.

What we’re facing are the same forces of darkness faced by Martin Luther King, Jr., Gandhi, Thurgood Marshall, Susan B. Anthony, and others.

It’s the same struggle, against the same enemies: Fear and hate.
18/ Leaders who are much wiser than me have said that the way to answer hate is with love.

“Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.”— Martin Luther King, Jr.

end/
All of my threads are now blogposts. You can view this one here: terikanefield-blog.com/start-doing-it…

When I talked about accepting the members of the GOP who made Trump possible, remember: This is the only way to expand the anti-Trump coalition and reach a goal of 60- 65%.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Feb 21
Putin knows how to wield disinformation and he knows that the United States is divided: A large portion of the population, including the most influential voices from a major political party, want the United States to emulate his Russia.

1/
Some background:

After Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation, Pat Buchanan said Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today" because he was stamping out western evils like easy divorce and homosexuality.
buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…

2/
British right-winger Katie Hopkins, in an article in which she was interviewed with her friend Ann Coulter, said “Putin rocks.”

Katie Hopkins then went on to praise Russia as being “untouched by the myth of multiculturalism and deranged diversity."

rt.com/uk/429777-kati…

3/
Read 4 tweets
Feb 18
Trump lost in court THREE MORE TIMES today.

Trump tried to get all three of these cases⤵️ dismissed and lost. I analyzed one of the cases last April, Blassingame, here: (Transcript on my blog.)

He tends not to do well in court, where facts matter.

1/
The defendants made the following arguments (screenshot #1)

Trump also claims, among other things, that he has absolute immunity. (#2)

It turns out that the absolute immunity question isn't as easy as you might think (but Trump still lost).

2/
If you want to get caught up on one of the cases, my analysis from last April is here:terikanefield.com/blassingame-v-…

And here:

You can read the court's decision here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

3/
Read 8 tweets
Feb 16
Um . . . this isn't the defense Trump thinks it is.

Trump published a letter he received from Mazars dated (it looks like) 2014. He then summarized the letter.

#1: What Mazars said
#2: What Trump says Mazars said

Me = 🤦‍♀️

Does he think nobody can or will actually read it?
Mazars said, "Trump is responsible for preparing the financial statement."

Also Mazars does not "undertake to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made . . . "
Trump posts the letter and says Mazars "strongly states that all work was performed in accordance with professional standards and that there were "no material discrepancies in the financial statements."

There is no "I don't know how to read" defense.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 13
For this week’s blog post, I edited and combined a few of my recent threads.

I started with a reading of the newly unredacted sections of the Mueller report, then talked about some of the responses on Twitter . . .

terikanefield.com/is-social-medi…
. . . and concluded with thoughts about how social media brings out authoritarian instincts in large swaths of people who ordinarily would not be given to authoritarian impulses.



It's too easy for truth to lose, and when truth loses, democracy loses.
Right. And not all "manipulators" are bad actors, but all people need to learn to evaluate sources.

Reflectively saying, "Professor X should know" is not how to do it. It takes more work. Falling in line is always easier than doing the work.

Read 4 tweets
Feb 12
I'm tired of the word "accountable." It's a weasel word. Don't say "accountable." Say what you mean.

Does "accountable" mean
🔹Lose elections?
🔹Go to prison?
🔹Lose a lawsuit?
🔹Be hated?

It would be nice if all the good people were rewarded and the bad people punished.
So you want to start indicting people and gather the evidence after they're indicted?

Or not worry about evidence?

There are rules of evidence, which means that the stuff you've read in newspapers and Tweets probably isn't admissible in court . . .
Indicting people and having juries return "not guilty" verdicts because there isn't evidence to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt may not accomplish what people think it will accomplish.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 12
One reason I think social media is turning everyone into authoritarians: people don't read or think.

They see a headline and have a strong emotional reaction, which they Tweet and which then gets repeated by others, who are also not thinking . . .

1/
Political psychologists like @karen_stenner describe the authoritarian personality.

Those with an authoritarian disposition are averse to complexity. They reject nuance.

They prefer sameness and uniformity and have “cognitive limitations.”

(link in the next Tweet)

2/
See for example, "Authoritarianism is not a momentary madness,” which originally appeared in this book, an dwhich Stenner has now made available free on her website, here: ……e-4700-aaa9-743a55a9437a.filesusr.com/ugd/02ff25_370…

Timothy Snyder also talks about the danger of what he calls Internet Memes.

3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(