House Committees formally move to intervene in the Trump v. Deutsche matter.

Doc here, @CourthouseNews: documentcloud.org/documents/5987…

Friday news dump in the Deutsche subpoena case.

In short:

* House Committees seek to intervene in the case, in essence, to be heard in court. (Remember, Trump sued Deutsche and Capital One, not Congress here.)

* Team Trump filed memo of law seeking a preliminary injunction.

In their written arguments, Trump's legal team calls the subpoenas a "transparent attempt to 'expose' Plaintiffs’ finances 'for the sake of exposure'" -- citing time frame of requests.

ICYMI, I broke down the scope earlier. courthousenews.com/deutsche-bank-…

Doc: documentcloud.org/documents/5987…

One reason for the length, as I explained in my article, is that the LLC that Trump used for the Trump Moscow negotiations was registered in 2008, and other Trump entities founded earlier are crucial to finding out the scope of his foreign cash.

What exactly are House Democrats looking into in their Deutsche and Capital One subpoenas?

This paragraph of their new letter, and what a paragraph it is, lays it out.

Story coming up soon on @CourthouseNews.

“Only the Committees can adequately defend their own interests in this action.”

— House Democrats, asking a federal judge for permission to intervene in Trump v. Deutsche.

My latest, @CourthouseNews courthousenews.com/house-democrat…