Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #ADIZ

Most recents (6)

Let me understand this really well, πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡¨πŸ‡¦ #NORAD QRA fighters didn't shoot down the πŸ‡¨πŸ‡³ Chinese spy balloon in American, then Canadian, then American airspace? πŸ˜‚

YOU HAD ONE JOB.

πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ
They flew right through the #ADIZ that the media get their bloomers in a bunch about when the Russians fly antiques through, and VIOLATED American and Canadian airspace, which the Russians never do, and the Chinese continue to do; did I get that right? What a bunch of bullsh!t.
I suspect the #USAF are flying their own spy drones over China on the regular, without the public's knowledge, in full view of the Chinese military, and they're terrified the Chinese will start shooting them out of the sky if they shoot down the balloon.
Read 31 tweets
Update: Yes the RAF QRA fighters did launch AND intercept the Tu-160s before they turned around.

FYI, @Reuters has not yet made the required corrections to their article that would make it truthful and accurate. It was published over 24hrs ago, and syndicated worldwide, spreading their misinformation globally.

reuters.com/world/russian-…
Read 13 tweets
πŸ‡·πŸ‡Ί On 2021-11-12 the Russian Air Force (#RuAF) made a long range aviation training sortie, which included 2x Tu-160 strategic bombers and tanker support, in international airspace.

Those are facts.
πŸ‡§πŸ‡ͺ In international airspace, they were shadowed by the Belgian Air Force.

πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ In international airspace, they were shadowed by the Norwegian Air Force.

Read 20 tweets
How many media organisations, alleged-journalists, and pundits, will display their ignorance by not looking up what an Air Defence Identification Zone #ADIZ is, and call it #Taiwan's airspace, which it is not.

Let's keep a running tab; I've dragged many of them previously.
You can play along at home:

twitter.com/search?q=filte…
Read 37 tweets
Reminder: a check mark has nothing to do with accuracy or integrity, and @eha_news is clearly not a trustworthy source. They published misinformation at best, or disinformation they were not aware of, and issued no corrections or retractions when corrected. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

They're not alone. Image
It is rare for @dwnews to fall for this, but they fell for it too. πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ

The narrative wasn't corrected at the onset it's now spread like wildfire. Finding the same lie across multiple checkmarked accounts does not make it true. Parroting a lie doesn't absolve journalists from reporting the truth, and this isn't it. πŸ‘‡

Read 23 tweets
Without much fanfare, Indonesia quietly issued Government Regulation (PP) No. 4/2018 on Airspace Security. The PP was meant to further establish the governance of Indonesia's airspace (per Law No. 1/2009 on aviation) <thread on #ADIZ> 1/
2/ The PP basically establishes the governance of Indonesia's airspace, who manages what and how as well as the procedures for certain scenarios (e.g. how to intercept a foreign aircraft, admin fines, etc.). In that sense, the PP is a generic framework for airspace management
3/ what is interesting is possible creation of Air Defense Identification Zone (#ADIZ) (art. 6) in addition to the establishment of prohibited and restricted areas (for the latter, PP said "govt. establishes..." and for ADIZ, it says "govt. *could* establish..."
Read 14 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!