Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #Blotgate

Most recents (10)

アメリカとかで流行ってるっぽい枠珍の疑惑系タグを独断で一通りまとめてみました🧐
どれもヤヴァイですが、改めて枠珍の毒性を総合的に認識しなおしましょう🧐
まずはmRNA枠珍そのものが人体に及ぼす疑惑一覧表🧐
この表の各々のリスクが相互に及ぼす影響はあえて聞かないでくれ・・・🥺
(1/15) Image
次に、企業組織系の疑惑一覧表🧐
世界中で組織ぐるみの隠蔽疑惑が起きていますので、日本でも同じように、組織ぐるみで隠ぺいする悪しき企みは、間違いなく存在するのでしょうね🙄
これら以外にも、研究者個人名を含む疑惑タグが結構ありましたが、あえて割愛します🙄
(2/15) Image
以下、これまで表に示した各項目の詳細です🧐
#plasmidgate
プラスミドdsDNA 混入疑惑
・LNPにDNA断片を封入して世界中のヒトに導入
・逆転写によらず遺伝子改変される
・胎盤移行した場合、末代まで祟られる

note.com/hiroshi_arakaw…
#dsDNA
(3/15)
Read 17 tweets
1/50 #Science is an ongoing process that serves to investigate phenomena, gain new insights or "correct prior knowledge" and this only works in #discourse. This includes diversity of #Opinion, #tolerance and a broad debate space. This is a large thread.
2/50 "#trust the science" is in my view the most #antiscience statement ever. #Questioning science is how you do #Science. This thread gives some examples and further questions.
scientificamerican.com/article/why-do…
3/50 What about good ##scientific #Practice? I found a glaring example here (of all things, in what I consider to be a rush to #vaccine #approval). #blotgate
trialsitenews.com/a/startling-ev…
Read 28 tweets
BREAKING 🧀🧀🧀
#Blotgate hits the big time with a breakdown on @EpochTimes and @zerohedge

The report in this article was based on our findings published here on twitter

@sonia_elijah @chrismartenson

theepochtimes.com/health/pfizer-…
Follow-up report.
10th Jan 2023.
#blotgate

Please follow the hashtags for more threads and tweets

@JesslovesMJK
@MidwesternDoc
Read 3 tweets
@IanCopeland5 is acting for the US Dept of defense performing this role. They set him up with a shell genomics company to frame him as an authority.

The implications of this are profound....

The tweet ignoring responses and mocking dissenters is irrelevant
Under normal circumstances a "free" society relies on the judiciary to act in the public's interest to protect from tyrannical governments. But the judiciary is captured, just like in nazi Germany.

So the last stop is the military. Who are they working for?
Now you have your answer.

The military are the only entity who have the resources to force the rollout of the failed gene therapy vaccines and support the fraud needed to sell it, such as #blotgate

It's the same in the UK
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
Read 7 tweets
BOMBSHELL: The western blots submitted to the FDA & EMA as well as used to justify the approvals, look to be completely falsified. This according to a deep investigation done by @sonia_elijah. Pfizer’s were copied & pasted, proven via forensic analysis.

trialsitenews.com/a/startling-ev…
Could this be why Pfizer and the FDA wanted the clinical trial data hidden for 75 years?

This, if corroborated is the definition of a Smoking Gun.

Shall we trend? #PfizerExposed #pfizerblots
Some key questions asked by @sonia_elijah that beg for answers.

1How did the “copy and paste” data sail through the radar of the regulators?
Read 6 tweets
.@elonmusk this is not OK

The engagement on this account is high, twitter blue is enabled and there are 40K followers

This important tweet was suppressed within 2 hours of its posting, having had 100 RT within minutes
I have been at this long enough to know when a tweet is gaining traction organically and when it is being suppressed.

This one has been suppressed and the shadowban is in place.

You asked for $8(US) a month - fine so I agreed. Nowhere in the T&C does it say...
That you could or would (under set circumstances) shadow ban the account.

Nothing in these tweets is false, misleading or offensive (except maybe to people who make false claims about things that they are selling).

You even said this
help.twitter.com/en/using-twitt…
Read 5 tweets
New Cheese 🧀🧀🧀on #Blotgate - The emerging scandal that keeps on giving.
The EMA and FDA reviews of the Pfizer BNT162b2 molecular biology assays were not independent reviews at all.
Pfizer wrote their documents.
@chrismartenson

The paper that David is referring to is published as a "peer reviewed" paper in @JPharmSciences

Except it wasn't that at all, it was a submission by Pfizer in response to the EMA and FDA questions posed in relation to their gene therapy product.
[PDF: jpharmsci.org/action/showPdf…]
It has simply been reconstituted as a "peer reviewed" manuscript.

These are the claims in the paper but they are not shown to be true.

Let's ignore the "safe and effective" claim for obvious reasons
Read 19 tweets
#blotgate refers to this thread that exposed the comedy Westerns that Pfizer submitted to the FDA as proof of protein product.

But they turned out to be AWBs - "automated Western blots" which are not the same as Western blots at all
Differences explained here
nature.com/articles/nmeth…
Read 8 tweets
STINKY CHEESE🧀🧀🧀

What do you call something that's too good to be true from a company that has previously been convicted of fraud?

Yep. More cartoon Westerns, this time from Pfizer directly. Nobody checked them.

#Blotgate
👇👇👇 Image
The source document sent to me appears to be from those released under @AaronSiriSG @IamBrookJackson legal actions to investigate fraud in the Pfizer vaccine study that the FDA said they needed 75 years to release the documents.

Yet they assessed the 450,000 pages in 24 hours? Image
I'll say that again.

There were 11 MILLION total documents (44,000 patients, minimum 250 pages per patient plus 350,000 assessment and summary documents).
The FDA was given the glossy summary on the 10th December.

The vaccine was "approved" on the 11th December. ImageImage
Read 13 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!