Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #CCSS

Most recents (6)

1/
Russia has already lost.

Not just the war in Ukraine. It is no longer a superpower, and aside from the absurdist threat of nuking every major city on the planet, it is hardly effecting the world's political flow.
2/
Culturally, there's a couple of indie rock groups, a top tier ballet troup, chess masters and (of course) hockey players. Nobody reads Russian books, not even those translated. Movies?

Name three from Russia. Okay, name just one.
3/
South Korea is of course drowning 'em out. So too Bollywood (India) and Nollywood (Nigeria), with Hollywood (US) still being the envy of an outclassed and near-bankrupt entertainment industry.
Read 11 tweets
1/
When it comes to planet-wide crisis no wonder so many people’s mental model being so badly mistaken. Lack of basics.

Where is Pakistan? What's their problem with India?

Where is Ukraine? What's their problem with Russia?
2/
Then there's "globalization". Pollution reduction. Workplace safety. Bank fraud. Coal ashes being radioactive. Money laundering. Why reducing the number of births leads to better lives for women and higher income.

General state of ignorance.
3/
They could hardly be blamed given how reactionary their elders had been in providing a broader education to 'em as children.

But when it came to 'current events', less excusable.
Read 9 tweets
En el #DiaDeLaMujerYLaNinaEnLaCiencia, un tributo especial a las #CientíficasSociales que han hecho posible la fundamentación empírica y teórica del #feminismo, investigando los mecanimos de la opresión patriarcal, transformado nuestra visión del mundo y desafiando a la academia.
Para empezar, una breve búsqueda revela que no hay ni una sola página dedicada a las aportaciones de las #CientíficasSociales ni en la historia de las #CCSS ni en las típicas recopilaciones de #mujerescientificas, de manera que sus trabajos revolucionarios carecen de genealogía.
Sin embargo, aquí van algunos descubrimientos de #CientíficasSociales sin los cuales las #CCSS no habrían transformado el conocimiento empírico y teórico de diferencias y desigualdades en las formas de organización social y las construcciones culturales que las naturalizan.
Read 10 tweets
#MTBoS...here's the thing:

When you think about the math you currently teach, does it require THIS LEVEL OF critical thinking and mathematization?
This thread by @aetherlev dives into the mathematizing that occurred behind the K-pop stan to troll the Tulsa rally.

Let's take a closer look at what they did...with a lens for the mathematics that they used thru the 8 SMPs of the #CCSS
Not only did they 1) make sense of a problem (45 decided to hold a rally at the cite of the Tulsa massacre, originally scheduled for Juneteenth -->intentional?? yeaa) they persevered in solving the problem (they bought as many tickets to the event as they possibly could)
Read 11 tweets
Hilo. Lamentablemente, las finanzas de la ⁦#CCSS vienen presentando problemas desde antes de la pandemia, las que irremediablemente se han visto agravadas por el impacto del virus en el empleo y la consecuente reducción de cuotas obrero-patronales. semanariouniversidad.com/ultima-hora/mi…
@CCSSdeCostaRica A esto debemos agregar la enorme informalidad que existe en el país y que muy probablemente crezca.
Frente a ello, el Gobierno debe proponer medidas para atender la situación de las finanzas de la Caja, abordar la informalidad, pero sin ahogar ni a empleados, ni a patronos.
Read 4 tweets
@ehanford Maybe very little new research in reading research has come out since 80s that has fundementally shifted our understanding. Marketing documents from Amplify are not research. When you dig into citations, recycled, often just NRP. #ncte19 (quickthoughts.jgregorymcverry.com/s/2gKDNO)
Look how you frame the narraritive "teachers don't know this science" "" "teacher prep is bad" this is an agenda and not research and also not based in reality. Frankly I find it insulting #ncte19 (quickthoughts.jgregorymcverry.com/s/WkE1H)
@ehanford Folks love quantitative theoretical models. Looking at variance explained by different variables helps us understand reading. But to suggest Gough & Tunmer's model is superior leaves many question. So many better models with < error #ncte19 (quickthoughts.jgregorymcverry.com/s/A4S6D)
Read 14 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!