Ed Clissold Profile picture
Chief U.S. Strategist for Ned Davis Research (NDR). The truth resists simplicity so let's debate in 280 characters. Charts over text. rt ≠ endorsements.
Orderflowtradr Profile picture Zvika Schechter Profile picture Sean K Profile picture Robotboy☮️ Profile picture John S Ohmer Profile picture 7 subscribed
Mar 1 5 tweets 2 min read
A 🧵on the election and markets:
Biden/Trump is a rematch no one wants, but Biden in particular has an approval rating issue. At 41%, he has the lowest of any president seeking reelection at this point in the year. The median for incumbents who won is 55%. @NDR_Research 1/5 Image Taking Biden's reelection bid out of the equation, presidential approval acts like any sentiment indicator. A low % implies pessimism, which tends to be bullish for stocks.
For approval rating there's a "no bad it's bad" zone but Biden's approval would need to fall 6 points. 2/5 Image
Jan 26 5 tweets 2 min read
The Fed is preparing the markets for a rate cut. Cuts have been bullish on avg. The DJIA has been flat before the 1st cut & up 15% a year later.
Context matters, esp. vs the economic cycle. (Btw, we use the DJIA for more history but trends are similar w/SPX). @NDR_Research 1/5 Image When the Fed has avoided recession, stocks have ripped higher, +24% 1 yr later.
When the economy has been in recession within a year of the 1st cut, the DJIA has weak beforehand but +10% 1 yr later. Most of the gains came in months 8-12. Why? Again, context matters. 2/5 Image
Jan 19 6 tweets 3 min read
We're entering the ❤️ of earnings season, so here's a 🧵on where we are in the cycle.
1. The bull market has left the early sentiment-driven phase when "P" rises > "E" and entered the earnings-driven phase (e.g., EPS growth needed for bull to continue). @NDR_Research 1/6 Image @NDR_Research 2. SPX trades not off EPS growth but the change in the growth rate. Consensus is calling for EPS growth to accelerate in CY24, which would be bullish.
Investors have learned that analysts are often too optimistic, so it's TBD if their positive outlook comes to fruition. 2/6 Image
Jan 4 6 tweets 3 min read
We published our 23 charts of 2023. A sample:
1. File 2023 under the market doing what is needed to prove the majority wrong. Recession and new lows were consensus in Jan. Not only did econ data exceed expectations, but the economy grew ⬆️trend & SPX gained 24%. @NDR_Research 1/5 Image 2. Partly due to the dour economic outlook, the market was ahead of the Fed in expecting rate cuts. A year ago fed funds futures expected the first cut in mid-2023. Powell followed through on his promise for higher for longer and is preparing for a mid-2024 first cut. 2/5 Image
Nov 4, 2023 7 tweets 3 min read
If the last 8 months felt weird to you, well, you're right. The $SPX rose for 5 straight months then fell for 3 straight months for only the 4th time on record. 2 came at the start of cyclical bulls (2016 & 1975) & 1 occurred during the ultra-long 1939-42 bear. @NDR_Research 1/7 Image What happened after the 3rd down month? A resumption of the uptrend has been more common than a continuation of the recent downtrend.
We expanded the study to include 4 up months. Results similar. SPX posted strong gains up to 12M later on avg. Last 50 yrs, up every time. 2/7 Image
Oct 16, 2023 9 tweets 4 min read
Lots of talk about 2023 a lot like 1987:
-big ⬆️ yr +Q3 drop
-poor breadth
- inflation & rates ⬆️/hawkish Fed
-USD 💪
A closer look reveals several differences:
1. $SPX MUCH stronger in 1987. +39% at highs vs +21% in 2023. 1987 was yr 3 of bull vs yr 1 in 2023 @NDR_Research 1/9 Image 2. Breadth weak in Q3 in both years. A big difference is in 2023, several breadth gauges made new cycle highs on summer rally. They failed to confirm in summer of 1987.
On a negative note, new lows worse in 2023 than 1987. 2/9 Image
Oct 7, 2023 7 tweets 3 min read
An earnings season 🧵
Historically, low EPS growth has been good for stocks, and vice versa. The exception has been when EPS growth <-20%, which occurs in recessions.
Q4 22 y/y EPS was -13%. Instead of ⬇️ <-20%, it rebounded. No recession & sweet spot for EPS! @NDR_Research 1/7 Image Analysts are an optimistic bunch. Consensus SPX estimates prove to be 8% points too high one year ahead, on average.
CY23 consensus for SPX operating EPS has fallen from 13.2% on 12/31/2022 to 11.7%. 2/7 Image
May 24, 2023 6 tweets 3 min read
The $SPX has once again struggled to climb above 4200. Lots of reasons for the most recent failure: debt ceiling, slowing disinflation, Fed uncertainty, banking crisis, looming recession fears. @NDR_Research 1/6 Image Valuations don't *seem* to be a major impediment. The forward and trailing P/E for the $SPX is modestly above its 40-year average. 2/6 Image
May 8, 2023 5 tweets 3 min read
Earnings season is mostly done (84% of $SPX reported). A 🧵:
The beat rate is up to 78.5%, reversing a 2yr decline. Investors learned a long time ago that mgmt keeps expectations low, but this implies companies are getting a better handle on macro conditions. @NDR_Research 1/5 Image The sales beat rate is up to 73.9%, on pace for the best quarter since Q4 2021. Overall a positive, but the fact that the EPS beat rate rose more than the sales beat rate implies a modest shift from price increases to cost controls, a potential macro risk in future quarters. 2/5 Image
Apr 22, 2023 5 tweets 2 min read
An earnings 🧵
This chart seems counterintuitive but makes sense when you think about it. Stocks have done worse when y/y EPS growth has been fast. Why? Investors see it as unsustainable. The exception is when growth is <-20% bc that only comes in recessions @NDR_Research 1/5 Image This chart makes more intuitive sense. It shows $SPX vs the change in the y/y change in EPS. Stocks have done best when EPS has been accelerating rapidly. 2/5 Image
Mar 7, 2023 8 tweets 3 min read
As Powell testifies today, here's a challenge for the Fed. The y/y change in the @NDR_RESEARCH Real Monetary, Fiscal, & Exchange Rate Policy Index has climbed to its highest level since April 2021. A weaker USD helps but the main stimulus driver is fiscal policy. A 🧵 1/8 A year ago gov’t spending was falling at its fastest rate since at least 1964. In April 2022 gov’t receipts were up 32%, the most since at least 1964. The combo meant the biggest fiscal tightening in over 60 years. Now, both are reversing. 2/8
Feb 21, 2023 9 tweets 5 min read
Many conflicting prophecies on economy and markets. A 🧵on how they could fit:
A bear market has never ended before the start of a recession. Most economists say US is not in recession but it's likely so logical conclusion is lows are not in place. Makes sense. @NDR_RESEARCH 1/9 Powell has repeatedly said he is willing to push the economy into recession to get inflation in check. Bears end a median of 14 months after the last hike. The Fed is expected to hike again on March 22, implying the bear could continue well into 2024. 2/9
Jan 23, 2023 5 tweets 3 min read
Going thru charts, these 5 stood out:
1. Friday was a 10.7:1 up day (using NDR Multi-Cap universe of stocks). With the 12/29’s 35:1 up day, it triggered a 2x 10:1 breadth thrust. SPX has risen at >2x its LT average for up to 6 months after signals, on average. @NDR_RESEARCH 1/5 2. We got 2x 10:1 up day signals in July and Nov 2022. We’ve adjusted our mantra from “trust the thrust” to “trust but verify.” One breadth thrust indicator that didn’t fire in 2022 but gave one on 1/12/23 was the NYSE 10-day advances/declines. @WalterDeemer 2/5
Jan 5, 2023 5 tweets 2 min read
Going thru charts, these 5 stood out. Today's topic: Growth vs Value
1. 2022 was the worst year for the R1G vs R1V since 2000. One may think Growth would rebound. Possible but once secular regimes flip they tend to persist. Value beat Growth every year 2001-2006 @NDR_Research 1/5 2. We’ve said that this is NOT dotcom 2.0. Most mega-cap Growth stocks have positive cash flow. The early 1970s Nifty 50 is a better comparison. That being said, FANMAG is tracking major bubbles after they popped. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...2/5
Nov 17, 2022 6 tweets 3 min read
A fun part of working at @NDR_Research is I can test commonly held beliefs. 4 myths circulating finance today:
Myth #1 ⬆️ rates are bad for FANMAG stocks.
Reality: Pre-COVID, FANMAG was cyclical. It was defensive during shutdowns, but FANMAG is becoming cyclical again. 1/ Image During shutdowns, FANMAG was among the few stocks whose business models thrived.
Put differently, I don't know of a single Growth manager who says "I was debating the terminal rate in my dividend discount model for <insert ticker here>. 2/
Nov 8, 2022 5 tweets 3 min read
5 charts to ponder on Election Day:
1. Pres' party added House seats only 4 times since 1900: 1902 (TR), 1934 (FDR), 1998 (Clinton), and 2002 (W). Dem presidents lose median of 36 seats, so Dems could outperform history and still lose the House (hollow victory?) 1/5 @NDR_Research Image 2. Stocks tend to rally after mid-terms, even under 1st term Democrats. Note that mid-term years prior to elections have been esp. weak under 1st term Dems.
(Not to Twitter trolls: these are just stats, not my opinion!) 2/5 Image
Nov 3, 2022 5 tweets 3 min read
Going thru charts, these 5 stood out:
1. Wed was an 11:1 down day (declining volume/advancing volume). That negates the 10/17 17:1 up day, so the clock starts over for a double 10:1 up day. @NDR_Research 1/5 Image 2. Even if we had gotten a 2x 10:1 signal, the ⬆️ in breadth thrust signals recently means a mindset shift from "trust the thrust" to "trust but verify." LT breadth has yet to verify any ST breadth signals YTD. % stocks >50-day M.A. got to 61% on 11/1. Needs to be >90%. 2/5 Image
Oct 15, 2022 5 tweets 3 min read
Going thru charts, these 5 stood out:
1. The market is entering the most bullish phase of the 4yr presidential cycle. But macro backdrop is terrible. Which will win?
We favor models over seasonality, but historical perspective provides useful context here. @NDR_Research 1/5 Image 2. The presidential cycle is more than the market randomly flipping heads more often after midterms. The combo of monetary & fiscal policy typically bottoms before midterms and accelerates thru the pre-election year. 2/5 Image
Sep 12, 2022 5 tweets 2 min read
Going thru charts, these 5 stood out:
1. Friday was a 12:1 up day (advancing volume/declining volume) based on NDR Multi-Cap universe. For a double 10:1 up day, we need another 10:1 day because the Aug 10 10:1 up day was negated by the Aug 22 10:1 down day. @NDR_Research 1/5 2. The % stocks >10-day moving averages jumped from 6% on Tues to 86% on Fri. Has to climb above 90% to trigger a breadth thrust. 2/5
Aug 29, 2022 5 tweets 3 min read
Going thru charts, these 5 stood out:
1. With all the focus on the Fed, don't forget fiscal policy has been very tight for over a year. The @NDR_Research Monetary & Fiscal Policy Index peaked in March 2021. On y/y basis, it's been getting less bad even as the Fed tightened. 1/5 2. An improvement in gov't policy would be in line with the presidential cycle. Monetary & fiscal policy tends to be restrictive after the presidential election, trough before midterm elections, and accelerate into the presidential election. r/t @WillieDelwiche 2/5
Aug 22, 2022 5 tweets 3 min read
Going thru charts, these 5 stood out:
1. 50-day MA breadth just missed. Hit 89.66% on 8/16. Breadth thrust is 90.0%. The difference is probably insignificant, but the indicator is built at 90. Close counts for horseshoes and hand grenades, not breadth thrusts. @NDR_Research 1/5 2. Recent weakness is in line with the NDR Cycle Composite. Highs on 8/23 and 9/8 and low on 9/30.
The Cycle Composite is based on historical trends. It's NOT a forecast. The market tends to follow but some years macro forces outweigh it. Trend is more important than level. 2/5