Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #ParisAccords

Most recents (4)

Aims of the #GreatReset #American #Bankers #Oligarchy ... "We will promote social justice policies to reduce inequalities including through support to tax redistributive & domestic resource optimization approaches social safety nets & or insurance schemes"
Newly Unsealed Docs in 2018 showed top #FDIC Officials Running Operation #ChokePoint* under 2013 #ObamaAdministration to form public/private oligarchy

* to freeze politically disfavored #businesses deemed not PC / high risk out of the financial system
forbes.com/sites/norbertm…
Read 39 tweets
WEF coverage on #COVID19 is like a lesson learned of the #TheLeft championing #Globalist ideals thru the lens of COVID19 (catalyst) climate (destination)

#GlobalistLeft view the pandemic as a stepping stone to change policies on health, social, economics

#thread ...
Jun 2019: A new agreement with WEF World Economic Forum gave multinational corporations influence over matters of global governance. #WEF & #UN signed a memo of understanding to partner with each other. UN quietly turned itself into a public-private partnership
/1
2008 Labour #British PM Gordon Brown & #French President Nicolas Sarkozy made calls for a new International Governance System for a (#WEF Global Redesign) to overhaul the int'l financial architecture” akin to the 1944 Bretton Woods
umb.edu/gri/introducti…
/2
Read 31 tweets
Bold Prediction: By 2022, Climate Change will be the only thing discussed at the #G20Summit

Within 3 years, we'll realize the goals of the #ParisAccords were like putting a Band-Aid on an amputation.

Here's why:
The whole concept of limiting Global Warming to 2°C by 2100 is predicated on a graph looking something like this:

images.app.goo.gl/U5JK9oBnHjf65c…
It uses a long-term moving average (in this case, 10yr) line to try and project where we are heading. The red line 'points to' somewhere around 2° by 2100.

The thing is, moving averages... move.
Read 16 tweets
Consider: It is SecDef’s last major public statement. He wants to note his disagreements w/ @realDonaldTrump but did so respectfully, aware that @POTUS is his C-in-C. The media generally could learn from restraint in the letter, and in how to frame arguments. Not personal.
It seems 2 me SecDef Mattis served @realDonaldTrump not because of shared beliefs —he and @POTUS disagreed on #JCPOA, #ParisAccords, response to Syrian WMD— but out of sense of duty. I deeply admire that though I think the General ought to have talked with media much, much more.
Like SecDef Rumsfeld, SecDef Mattis disdained role of educating public. It’s now among the key SecDef roles: Why are U.S. forces where they are? What is the mission? Why should they stay at this cost? Persuasion was a hallmark of Washington. I hope next SecDef adopts that goal.
Read 3 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!