Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #drybulk

Most recents (21)

1/
In shipping money is made by finding cheap optionality. It’s an inefficient market that on occasions give you great opportunities.

For me the greatest optionality is now to be found in #drybulk equities.
2/
Let’s take a look at $gogl. As reported in their previous presentation, they are currently making $8k more than index rates due to premium fleet and scrubber. With a cash break even of 11700 the company only need $4k index rates to survive another day.
3/
Compare that to a forward curve well above 16k/d in 2024 and 2025. Some would argue these forward rates are not sexy, but you are missing the point. With a record low order book and increasing regulations you should not be investing in the sector to collect 10-15% div.
Read 6 tweets
#Drybulk Thread:
1)
Drybulk is currently showing signs of a beautiful generational setup. With macro volatility increasing rapidly, there is no saying where equities might trade in the next couple of weeks, but this is the time to be prepared.
2)
Before I lay out the bull case I think it's worth looking back at 2020-2022. I would argue this whole period should be written off as a "one off."
2020 was the beginning of COVID. World shut down. Rates went to zero in Feb and Mar.
3)
2021 everything turned. Congestion and covid inefficiencies reduced supply substantially and rates 🚀.
2022 was the "Chinese lockdown" combined with a crash in Chinese real estate and Vale declining production. So lets look at 2019...This was when the real recovery started.
Read 8 tweets
1/ 2022 is on pace to see the lowest level of ship demolition since 2008.

This is into a global merchant fleet that has more than doubled in size over the same period.

High rates have ships out trading longer which means the fleet is getting older... for now.
2/ Although high shipping rates are likely to keep demolition muted for the balance of 2022, at some point this trend will need to reverse as 22% of the global fleet is now over 15 years old.

3/ Very few of these ships over 15 years old will comply with new IMO carbon efficiency regulations take effect January 1 2023. Costs to retrofit are prohibitive and are likely to result in early retirement of older ships even with high rates.

splash247.com/less-than-25-o…
Read 6 tweets
@kuppy is back in tankers.
🧵
"I think there is more [upside] to be had there. No new supply coming, or negligible, low inventories for refined product around the world, Russia is not supplying refined product, it has to come from further away, it's coming from the MEG, the USG"
"It's leading to much longer voyages [ie more tonne-miles] and also you're having a lot of inter-basin arbitrage. Clean rates, especially on MR's, have gone to decade highs. I think they're gonna stay here for a while, because there's really no deliveries expected for 2023,"
"2022-23 are in the bag in terms of what orderbook looks like. So unless they start ordering, and even then it's [20]24 before new supply comes, meanwhile refined product inventories keep drawing down every month, people start scrambling for inventory."
Read 10 tweets
Updated global fleet age and replacement requirements courtesy of the latest Danish Ship Finance report.

We are going to be hearing a lot more about negative fleet growth in #tankers and #drybulk in the coming years. Strap in for higher rates 🚀
Shipbuilding capacity still decreasing. Many second tier yards are unable to build the modern designs and sizes required. 129 second tier yards that delivered a ship in 2021 *did not receive any new orders in 2021*. These yards will most likely cease to exist in coming years.
Drybulk fleet detail. Orderbook to fleet acutely low in small sizes.
Read 5 tweets
1/ Time for a check-in on $NMM

With clean product tanker rates surging I have seen a lot of enthusiasm and speculation about what this means for EPS going forward.

Updated my model with the latest charters from 20-F and ran a spot rate sensitivity on remaining open/index days:
2/ Unfortunately most of $NMM's product tanker fleet is already fixed for Q2, gradually rolling off charter throughout the rest of the year and into 2023.

It seems more likely to be a tailwind to an already huge contract backlog in containers and strong expectations in drybulk.
3/ Personally I am expecting around $16 EPS and $700M of operating cash flow for 2022 with the way markets are shaping up.

This puts year end net debt and capital leases at around $900M and EV at around $1.8B
Read 7 tweets
1/ Below is a 20y chart of oil prices and the Baltic Dry Index.

Aside from being economically sensitive, there are a number of other reasons the two follow each other quite closely.

🧵
2/ As the oil price rises, ships slow down to achieve better fuel economy and save on fuel costs.

In a high oil price environment, ships will slow until the lowest total cost of operation is found.

This slowing reduces effective capacity and causes charter rates to rise.
3/ Both ships and oil also tend to follow the same investment cycle where a boom of investment leads to a supply glut, ensuing bust, and a long period of under-investment which sets up for another period of high rates. Rinse, repeat.
Read 8 tweets
1/ I'm going to pound the table a bit more about and show that shipbuilding capacity is insufficient to replace scrapping let alone accommodate trade volume growth.

But this time we will look at the global aggregate merchant fleet including all sectors.

🧵...
2/ Across all sectors, the global orderbook is only ~10% of the active fleet compared to ~8% that is already beyond economic life in the new high fuel cost/low emissions requirement paradigm. It the time it takes the ~10% to deliver, ~14% more will approach end of economic life.
3/ In 2022, ships reaching critical decision age whether to scrap or repair for compliance increases significantly and continues to increase each year this decade.

Notice in 2022 and beyond, the capacity of ships delivered fails to match capacity hitting the new 20 year wall.
Read 10 tweets
1/ 15 months ago I penned an article entitled "Welcome to the New Container Shipping Supercycle" questioning the premises of popular conceptions of supply and demand at the time.

Some reflections on what I got right and what I got wrong.

A 🧵...

seekingalpha.com/article/439810…
2/ New ship deliveries are not hard to predict 2 years into the future as it takes upwards of 18 months to build most ships from contract date. A dearth of new ordering through late 2020 ensured insufficient supply coming to market to through 2023 to meet demand.
3/ I was also correct that there was limited capacity to add additional megamax ships in 2024.

What I completely underestimated was the enormous demand and shipbuilding slot availability for new panamax ships in lieu of available megamax capacity.
Read 13 tweets
1/ Early indications point to #HungaTonga eruption being comparable in size to the largest eruption in the last century: Mt. Pinatubo in Philippines.

If this is in fact the case, it is likely to have major implications for climate, weather, and markets in coming years.

A 🧵...
2/ Leaning on data collected after the Pinatubo eruption in 1991 as the closest modern proxy, we can make some make some reasonable predictions on what impact #HungaTonga may have:

The huge amount of reflective ash released from Pinatubo caused significant global cooling:
3/ This reflective ash reduced the amount of sunlight reaching the earth's surface by as much as 10% immediately after eruption and continued to reduce sunlight for 3 years afterward
Read 11 tweets
Finally had a chance to dig into $grin (Grindrod Shipping) financials for Q3.

If you are an investor and haven't read it yet, I highly recommend it. The format and info is different than Q2. Here's what I found interesting...
1/N
Starting out in the fleet table, there have been some updates QoQ. There's also lazy accounting as there are 7 LTCI (not 8 as stated).

What's New?
1. Charter-in Purchase Price and Daily Charter-in Rates
2. IVS Phoenix is now "owned"
2/N
IVS Phoenix falls into this unusual disclosure. 4 owned vessels had financing where they were "sold", and Grindrod has the right to acquire at a certain date.

These are owned as they have long term control, but important to note they are not on the balance sheet.
3/N
Read 14 tweets
Time to discuss the ugly cousin of 2021.

The cheapest, most attractive risk/reward part of the freight world.

The best value that I see in the whole commodity spectrum(apols #uranium clan).

You might have already guessed it; it’s finally time to talk abt #tankers #OOTT 1/n
had to keep on producing, floating storage was the only solution leading to a majestic surge in freight rates. As lockdowns eased, floating storage was no longer needed, thus supply came back online while demand was nowhere near 2019 levels. Naturally the mkt collapsed. 3/n
To date it has not recovered. 2021 has been an annus horribilis for the tanker market. Indicatively, $VLCC ytd returns are -$615/day (not a typo!). At the same time demand was getting normalized and $OPEC was steadily increasing production. 4/n
Read 12 tweets
Global shipping fleet in perspective thanks to UNCTAD. New ship order books for #tankers and #drybulk are at decade lows, yet shipyards are full through 2023-end with orders from other sectors. Sure looks like a massive shortage of aggregate shipbuilding capacity coming 2024+
Shipyard capacity has been declining for a decade and 2022 will be the most painful year for shipbuilders yet. Orders have since recovered, but many yards have locked in contracts at unprofitable levels due to high steel prices and could post losses through 2023.
Although it is obvious that more shipbuilding capacity will be needed to replace the surge of ships ordered during the last boom, shipbuilders will only begin repairing balance sheets in 2024 and will need years of profitability before planning new capacity.
Read 5 tweets
Even with the very weak current IMO regulations, UNCTAD expects the fleet to slow by 6.7% this decade. An extra ~1% of new ship capacity per year will be needed to offset in addition to ~2% per year to replace old ships. Compare this to a #drybulk orderbook of just 5.6% today. Image
#Drybulk demand grew at a CAGR of 4.7% per year since China was admitted to the WTO. Even if this slows SIGNIFICANTLY to 2.5%, this means to maintain the very tight supply/demand balance we see today, we will need 5%+ of new ship capacity to deliver each year this decade. Image
In DWT (capacity terms) this 5%+ per year of new ships needed is equivalent to ~50M DWT. This is more ship capacity than has been built in each of the past 8 years. Although not a problem in isolation, shipyards are already full through 2023 ships from other fast growing sectors Image
Read 7 tweets
1/ ESG will be a huge tailwind for commodity trade in the coming years. Higher quality ores take significantly less energy to smelt. High quality supplies from further afield will replace lower quality supplies closer to production centers requiring far more #drybulk ton miles
2/ Using steel making as a case study we can see this effect with the 2 major steel making ingredients: iron ore and met coal. With capital markets closing off to coal investments, only the highest quality met coal projects will attract capital and prices will remain elevated:
3/ High coal prices combined with existing and impending carbon taxes will incentivize the highest quality iron ore supplies which use less coal. The market is already pricing this in with futures for high grade price premiums widening significantly in future years:
Read 12 tweets
Where are we in the #drybulk cycle?

Note: Baltic Dry Index reflects freight rates evolution in aggregate (routes and vessel types) for the Dry Bulk shipping sector. It’s expressed in points. A long-time perspective allows us to see the different cycles and how cyclical it is.
In Feb 2016, BDI reached its lowest point ever, 291 points (huge imbalance between available vessels and cargo demand). Since that moment there has been a sustained recovery, temporarily interrupted by:

❌ 2019: iron ore supply shock (Brumadinho dam collapse).
❌ 2020: covid-19.
Iron ore is a critical commodity for the sector (#1 by volume and ton-miles), especially Brazilian iron ore (~17% of global exports), which is in high demand from China (huge distance).

Table source: Clarkson Research Services.
Read 11 tweets
1/8
As we move closer to EEXI and other regulations we will see different narratives emerge. Many think non-eco ships will be useless overnight.
So what are the risks when buying a non-eco 2010 blt Kamsarmax today?
Let's take a look at the fleet in more depth.

#drybulk #EEXI
2/8
Capesize/Newcastlemax/VLOC:

The total number of Capesize+ vessels in the world is 1860.
177 are built 2005 or older. = 9.5% of the fleet.
1124 are built before 2013 = 60% of the fleet.

After 2013 we saw improved energy efficiency and they are often referred to as Eco.
3/8
Panamax/Kamsarmax:

The totalt number of Panamax/Kamsarmax vessels in the world is 2855.
626 are built 2005 or older = 22% of the fleet
1727 are built before 2013 = 60% of the fleet
Read 8 tweets
1/
I know I spam twitter with bullish tweets about #drybulk. There's a reason why I'm pounding table on this one. This might be the only(!) chance you will get in your life time to participate in a mega cycle. Remember, it's 18 years since the last one started.
2/
Let's start with the demand side.
There's two drivers of demand. Demand for the commodity and supply of the commodity. Infinite demand for iron ore doesn't help if there's no supply to put on ships. But they are connected. ---
3/
Increased demand for the commodity leads to higher prices, incentivising increased production.
Will soybean producers be likely to increase production and shipments going forward?
Read 11 tweets
I invite you to read my inaugural survey of operating costs In #DryCargo #Shipping. I have ranked six publicly-traded companies.

#drybulk $DSX $EGLE $GNK $SALT $SB $SBLK

seekingalpha.com/article/436971…
This is how #drycargo #shipping companies rank from No 1 (lowest cost provider) to No 6 (highest cost provider), based on average daily operating cost for 2017-2019. Starting at No 1: $SB at $5,331

#drybulk $DSX $EGLE $GNK $SALT $SB $SBLK
Survey of Operating Costs in #DryCargo #Shipping. Featured at No 2: $SBLK at $5,382

#drybulk $DSX $EGLE $GNK $SALT $SB $SBLK
Read 7 tweets
Ok, couple of thoughts on #tankers noise. Here we go:
Bullish thesis:
1) contango for longer. Obviously dead now, no if and but. Dead. If it reappears it'll be a whole new case, for a bunch of different reasons.
2) supply/demand. Nonsense.
Supply is rising, demand is falling that's a reality. No matter how slow supply is rising when demand is peaked and then falling (secular!) this is a bad combination. Wanna proof? #drybulk. Ok, but how about scrapping?
3) first of all. You need rates to fall below OPEC for some
time and kind of a short-term hopeless consensus to kick this cycle, which is not a good position to be in from shareholders perspective. Secondly it'll take time and has to overcome the supply so that the whole tonnage really starts to contract, not just offsets increase.
Read 11 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!