Discover and read the best of Twitter Threads about #groundbreaking

Most recents (4)

Thank you for reporting on the difficulties faced by the #NoOutsiders project team ("Gay education in primaries climbs back into the closet" (TES, October 17)

The project's aim to challenge homophobia & transphobia in & thru primary education was always likely2 be controversial
The project's aim to challenge homophobia and transphobia in and through primary education was always likely to be #controversial, but we have no intention of being stopped in our tracks even by the #extremity of #opposition to this #groundbreaking work from certain groups
but we have no intention of being stopped in our tracks even by the extremity of opposition to this groundbreaking work from certain groups.

It seems that there are some people who will stand out against equality whatever the changes in the law
#NoOutsiders
Read 9 tweets
(1\25) The #vision & addressable market opportunities of Blockchain’s such as @ElrondNetwork & accompanying #community/network $EGLD ⚡️ is vast beyond what many can fully grasp. It’s the opportunity to re-write the rules of the status quo system that currently serve the few (1%) Image
(2\25) & inherently promotes inequitable opportunity & wealth inequality. #Blockchain systems can re-shape every industry #Finance, #Entertainment, #SupplyChain, Content Delivery, #BigTech, #Food, #Agriculture, #Education, #Politics/Government, #Transportation, #healthcare
(3\25) #Digital gaming etc. The existing status quo system restricts the majority from participating both in the value sharing (#investing) at the ground level due to supposed accredited investor protections & the value creation (new products/services) unless one has access to
Read 26 tweets
I have a new theory of constitutional law. I call it “living constitutionalism.” It claims that the Const. has been interpreted by the Court in different ways at different times. It is thus a “living" doc. Living Constitutionalism is our law and judges take an oath to support it.
The argument for it is simple:

P1: Texts whose interpretations change over time are "living."

P2: The Constitution is a text whose interpretation has changed over time.

C: Therefore, the Constitution is a living text.
The theory opens up whole new lines of inquiry, eg: Given that the Court's interpretation of some provisions has NOT changed, we can now ask such Q as, "why have some of its interps changed and others not? Which should be kept? Which discarded? Which recovered?"

#groundbreaking.
Read 3 tweets
The Journal of #Palestine Studies issue 194 is out and free to all readers through June. It features a number of #groundbreaking articles by Laila Parsons, @anne_irfan, @aseilab, Marya Farah, @benabyad, and Adam Haniyeh
Read it all for free here: palestine-studies.org/en/node/1649965 Image
Also, the Journal is especially proud to be running reviews of two 2019 Palestinian Book Award winners in this issue: @4noura's Justice for Some: Law and the Question of Palestine (Stanford University) and Andrew Ross' Stone Men: The Palestinians Who Built Israel (Verso Books)
We will be sharing articles and reviews from the Journal of Palestine Studies issue 194 all week-long, but feel free to download the issue for free: palestine-studies.org/en/node/1649965
Read 3 tweets

Related hashtags

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!