Here's some questions for those who believe #QAnon is bullshit:

Why is it that l research I did prior to Q arriving on the scene corralates with info Q drops?

Why is it that my writing/vlogging/podcasting Q drops/my research that I am actively silenced WHILE RECORDING? (Con't)

Why is is that the app I use to record and the app I use for podcasting no longer recognize my mic, despite uninstall/reinstall?

Why is it that I was silenced after reading the title of a Senate presentation on Civil and Human Rights in America?

For reference and recommended reading (10 pages long)

targetedjustice.com/uploads/1/1/6/…

This obviously contains important info that douchebags want you to remain ignorant about.

#humanrights #civilrights #USSenate #ti #TargetedIndividuals
#TortureByContract #FISAAbuse

Why is it, that since I started sharing the info I found and pieced together, that my family has been bombarded with pulsating EMF radiation and we've all developed tinnitus around the same time?

Why is it that my therapist told me to take a deal, if offered?

(Con't)

Why is it that a psychotropic sedative was slipped into my potassium supplement?

Your perception of reality isn't the same as mine; we have different life experiences which shape how we view our own realities.

So, when you say something is bullshite when I've lived how it's not bullshite, you're basically gaslighting me, and anyone else who (con't)

stumbled upon something the masses weren't supposed to ever know.

And the worst? You outright dismiss any of the findings, thus keeping ignorance front and center. It makes one wonder (esp for "journalists") if stonewalling and ignoring proofs qualifies one as a Mockingbird?

You are entitled to speak of your own experiences and perceptions; that should go without saying.

But don't shit on mine because you a) obviously haven't done the research and b] can't wrap your mind around stuff you chose not to research.

Because gaslighting is a douchebag

move.

Don't encourage ignorance. If anything, one should (ESPECIALLY IF A JOURNALIST) lay out the idea one wishes to cover in an objective manner and encourage people to research and come to their own determination. That fact people don't do that is very telling.
(Con't)

Here's a starter: cover systematic abuse of citizens world wide with no touch torture tech.

Cover how it started as a Nazi science project imported by the OSS as Project Paperclip. While we venerate Werner Von Braun, we gloss over Mengele's contribution to American science.

That incredibly fucked up Nazi science project is still going strong.

That incredibly fucked up Nazi science project has been carried worldwide.

And those who suffer as unconsenting test subjects don't need your ass trying to keep the world ignorant of their abuse.

(Con't)

Like it or loathe it, Q has made mention of this abuse.

Q wants the world to know what the Deep State is trying to do in order to manipulate a world full of people into being mental slaves.

You have a problem with that? Fine.

I too have an issue with people with wanting

to control the information I found, which funny enough deals with creating a society of mental slaves based on trauma. Trauma, like watching people die on TV.

Trauma meant to make us surrender our rights, such as one sees after mass shootings.

They (DS) don't want you to

see the pattern. But it's there, and it's telling.

And I get it; in a world of psyops, one had to be careful of who they follow and listen to. It's easy to be led astray.

No serious follower of the Q movement will argue this point, since ya know, we live it.

But consider the media's attempts to stop people from following the Q phenomena, which encourages one to research for themselves.

They aren't saying "Believe me now because I'm interesting."

They're saying fucked up shit happens and it will/can be proven without a doubt.

And when that happens, I fear for you since you actively dismissed this opportunity to gain a bigger, better perspective on a situation that's been stewing for decades and had come to a critical point.

/rant.

(brought to you by the differing opinions of @zachhaller and @caitoz)